2015-10-08 04:13 skrev Kang Kai:
> On 2015年10月06日 23:30, Petter Mabäcker wrote: > >> 2015-10-06 16:08 skrev Burton, Ross: >> >>> On 6 October 2015 at 14:43, Petter Mabäcker <pet...@technux.se> wrote: >>> >>>> Great. As you will notice also when formatted properly it will not apply due to that readline63-001 and readline63-002 isn't applied so 'patchlevel' is incorrect. That makes me wondering what the patching strategy is? In my opinion we should consider adding the official readline-6.3 patches as well. Should I add a bug report for that or leave it as is (depending on the strategy...)? >>> >>> Adding the rest of the patches would have been a sensible thing to do. Right now, we're frozen as we're about to release 2.0, but a bug or patches post-release would be much appreciated. >>> >>> Ross >> >> I have created a defect and assigned myself (https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8451 [1]) and will send something up when the normal integration is open again. >> >> BR Petter > > Sorry for late reply that we had The National Day vacation. I can help for this defect if you please. It's OK, I can send something up for this. See the discussion with Marko within the same thread about a recommended way forward (http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-October/111353.html). If you have any requirements for the verification of the bug please update the bug report with this info. BR Petter > -- > Regards, > Neil | Kai Kang Petter Mabäcker Technux <pet...@technux.se> www.technux.se Links: ------ [1] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8451
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
