2015-10-06 14:58 skrev Burton, Ross:
> On 6 October 2015 at 12:23, Petter Mabäcker <pet...@technux.se> wrote: > >> The patch must be applied by something/someone.. For example Debian solves it by doing their own .diff patch (http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/readline6/readline6_6.3-8.debian.tar.xz [1]). I can send a suggestion about how to solve this in a proper way. > > Whoops, the file wasn't renamed to .patch and even after being renamed, it isn't actually a properly formatted patch. I'll fix this up now. Great. As you will notice also when formatted properly it will not apply due to that readline63-001 and readline63-002 isn't applied so 'patchlevel' is incorrect. That makes me wondering what the patching strategy is? In my opinion we should consider adding the official readline-6.3 patches as well. Should I add a bug report for that or leave it as is (depending on the strategy...)? BR Petter > Thanks for noticing! > > Ross Links: ------ [1] http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/readline6/readline6_6.3-8.debian.tar.xz
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
