2015-10-08 06:31 skrev Marko Lindqvist:
> On 6 October 2015 at 17:08, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > >> On 6 October 2015 at 14:43, Petter Mabäcker <pet...@technux.se> wrote: >> >>> Great. As you will notice also when formatted properly it will not apply due to that readline63-001 and readline63-002 isn't applied so 'patchlevel' is incorrect. That makes me wondering what the patching strategy is? In my opinion we should consider adding the official readline-6.3 patches as well. Should I add a bug report for that or leave it as is (depending on the strategy...)? >> Adding the rest of the patches would have been a sensible thing to do. Right now, we're frozen as we're about to release 2.0, but a bug or patches post-release would be much appreciated. Ross > > The strategy I introduced in 30a38ea1ee933fb134a5ee9000298703cab93692 > was not to add the patches, but to fetch them as upstream source. > That was dropped when readline was updated to 6.3 (maybe there was no > patches for it at the time): > 66bc6f4127e88db18e260c71d181aecfd58c7999 > > - ML Hello Marko, When looking at the dates for the 6.3 integration my guess is that no patches existed for 6.3 yet (compared to the dates for the patches..). I will give it a try to use your 5.2 strategy when applying the 6.3 patches to make it looks the same for both versions. Thanks for pointing this out! BR Petter Petter Mabäcker Technux <pet...@technux.se> www.technux.se
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
