On 6 October 2015 at 14:43, Petter Mabäcker <pet...@technux.se> wrote:
> Great. As you will notice also when formatted properly it will not apply > due to that readline63-001 and readline63-002 isn't applied so > 'patchlevel' is incorrect. That makes me wondering what the patching > strategy is? In my opinion we should consider adding the official > readline-6.3 patches as well. Should I add a bug report for that or leave > it as is (depending on the strategy...)? > Adding the rest of the patches would have been a sensible thing to do. Right now, we're frozen as we're about to release 2.0, but a bug or patches post-release would be much appreciated. Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core