I don't think open vs close has a big impact on design. The issue of state full vs stateless are foundational.
So we need to talk about when and why state full registration is needed. Phil On 2013-08-22, at 12:39, Anthony Nadalin <tony...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Phil, this just brings me back to the question, "why are we doing this in > OAuth" ? Configuration endpoint (nothing to do with OAuth), Registration > Endpoint (too complicated, goes beyond the bounds of OAuth), why not just a > stateless and state full registration message and that's it? > > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Phil Hunt > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:23 PM > To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) > Cc: oauth mailing list > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration Conference Call: Thu 22 > Aug, 2pm PDT: Conference Bridge Details -- Correction! > > I have attached a PDF including some of my thoughts, concerns, and > suggestions for the upcoming meeting. > > Phil > > @independentid > www.independentid.com > phil.h...@oracle.com _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
