notifications  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] Replace Akka with Apache Pekko [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Remove the unused hadoop Iceberg catalog type [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove the unused hadoop Iceberg catalog type [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove the unused hadoop Iceberg catalog type [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Wire RoleAnnotationEnforcer into notebook-migration-service [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wire RoleAnnotationEnforcer into notebook-migration-service [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wire RoleAnnotationEnforcer into notebook-migration-service [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wire RoleAnnotationEnforcer into notebook-migration-service [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Authorization bypass: @RolesAllowed unenforced on microservices, workflow-compiling-service requires no token at all [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Authorization bypass: @RolesAllowed unenforced on microservices, workflow-compiling-service requires no token at all [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): cover DataProcessor state-frame and executor-exception paths [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover DataProcessor state-frame and executor-exception paths [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover DataProcessor state-frame and executor-exception paths [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover DataProcessor state-frame and executor-exception paths [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover DataProcessor state-frame and executor-exception paths [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover DataProcessor state-frame and executor-exception paths [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover DataProcessor state-frame and executor-exception paths [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add WorkflowActor receive-behavior tests [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add WorkflowActor receive-behavior tests [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add WorkflowActor receive-behavior tests [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add WorkflowActor receive-behavior tests [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add WorkflowActor receive-behavior tests [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): cover OutputManager partitioner, port, and state-emit branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover OutputManager partitioner, port, and state-emit branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover OutputManager partitioner, port, and state-emit branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover OutputManager partitioner, port, and state-emit branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover OutputManager partitioner, port, and state-emit branches [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(local-dev): auto-apply pending sql/updates before the sbt build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(local-dev): auto-apply pending sql/updates before the sbt build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(local-dev): auto-apply pending sql/updates before the sbt build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(local-dev): auto-apply pending sql/updates before the sbt build [texera] via GitHub
• [I] local-dev: auto-detect and apply pending sql/updates before the sbt build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] local-dev: auto-detect and apply pending sql/updates before the sbt build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] local-dev: auto-detect and apply pending sql/updates before the sbt build [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Unify the duplicate workflow compilers into a shared common module [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Unify the duplicate workflow compilers into a shared common module [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(workflow-compiler): unify duplicate compilers into common/workflow-compiler [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add AsyncRPCClient unit tests for createInvocation and logControlReply [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add AsyncRPCClient unit tests for createInvocation and logControlReply [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add AsyncRPCClient unit tests for createInvocation and logControlReply [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add AsyncRPCClient unit tests for createInvocation and logControlReply [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add AsyncRPCClient unit tests for createInvocation and logControlReply [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover OperatorMetadataGenerator unregistered-class error [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover OperatorMetadataGenerator unregistered-class error [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover OperatorMetadataGenerator unregistered-class error [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover OperatorMetadataGenerator unregistered-class error [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover OperatorMetadataGenerator unregistered-class error [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover OperatorMetadataGenerator unregistered-class error [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover OperatorMetadataGenerator unregistered-class error [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): cover WorkflowExecution.getState PAUSED and UNKNOWN branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover WorkflowExecution.getState PAUSED and UNKNOWN branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover WorkflowExecution.getState PAUSED and UNKNOWN branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover WorkflowExecution.getState PAUSED and UNKNOWN branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): cover WorkflowExecution.getState PAUSED and UNKNOWN branches [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Allow setting a custom cover image on workflow dashboard cards [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(local-dev): unify the CLI surface for agent use [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(local-dev): unify the CLI surface for agent use [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(local-dev): unify the CLI surface for agent use [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Delete WorkflowExecutionsResource.insertOperatorPortResultUri and use the generated OperatorPortExecutionsDao [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Unify local-dev CLI for agent use: --json everywhere, up/down <service>, --skip-build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Unify local-dev CLI for agent use: --json everywhere, up/down <service>, --skip-build [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Unify local-dev CLI for agent use: --json everywhere, up/down <service>, --skip-build [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(amber): persist operator port result URIs through a ClientEvent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(amber): persist operator port result URIs through a ClientEvent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(amber): persist operator port result URIs through a ClientEvent [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(amber): persist operator port result URIs through a ClientEvent [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(pybuilder): cover PythonLexerUtils triple-quote escape and toggle branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(pybuilder): cover PythonLexerUtils triple-quote escape and toggle branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(pybuilder): cover PythonLexerUtils triple-quote escape and toggle branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(pybuilder): cover PythonLexerUtils triple-quote escape and toggle branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(pybuilder): cover PythonLexerUtils triple-quote escape and toggle branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(pybuilder): cover PythonLexerUtils triple-quote escape and toggle branches [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(pybuilder): cover PythonLexerUtils triple-quote escape and toggle branches [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover CSV scan exec and Twitter v2 source descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover CSV scan exec and Twitter v2 source descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover CSV scan exec and Twitter v2 source descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover CSV scan exec and Twitter v2 source descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover CSV scan exec and Twitter v2 source descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover CSV scan exec and Twitter v2 source descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): cover CSV scan exec and Twitter v2 source descriptors [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(workflow-core): cover JGitVersionControl and GitVersionControlLocalFileStorage [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): cover JGitVersionControl and GitVersionControlLocalFileStorage [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): cover JGitVersionControl and GitVersionControlLocalFileStorage [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): cover JGitVersionControl and GitVersionControlLocalFileStorage [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): cover JGitVersionControl and GitVersionControlLocalFileStorage [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): cover JGitVersionControl and GitVersionControlLocalFileStorage [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): cover JGitVersionControl and GitVersionControlLocalFileStorage [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Add end-to-end integration test for multi-region workflow execution [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add end-to-end integration test for multi-region workflow execution [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add end-to-end integration test for multi-region workflow execution [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(amber): add X-shaped multi-region workflow e2e integration test [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: add missing /pve route to single-node nginx [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: add missing /pve route to single-node nginx [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: add missing /pve route to single-node nginx [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: add missing /pve route to single-node nginx [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(pve): serve PVE requests under /api/pve and drop per-gateway rewrites [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: repair Python virtual environment in single-node deployment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: repair Python virtual environment in single-node deployment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: repair Python virtual environment in single-node deployment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: repair Python virtual environment in single-node deployment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: repair Python virtual environment in single-node deployment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: repair Python virtual environment in single-node deployment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(pve, v1.2): repair Python virtual environment in single-node deployment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(pve, v1.2): repair Python virtual environment in single-node deployment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(pve, v1.2): repair Python virtual environment in single-node deployment [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit tests for PhysicalFileNode, Schema, and VFSURIFactory [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit tests for PhysicalFileNode, Schema, and VFSURIFactory [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit tests for PhysicalFileNode, Schema, and VFSURIFactory [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit tests for PhysicalFileNode, Schema, and VFSURIFactory [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit tests for PhysicalFileNode, Schema, and VFSURIFactory [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit tests for PhysicalFileNode, Schema, and VFSURIFactory [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-core): add unit tests for PhysicalFileNode, Schema, and VFSURIFactory [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(common): cover auth header fields and visualization descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(common): cover auth header fields and visualization descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(common): cover auth header fields and visualization descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(common): cover auth header fields and visualization descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(common): cover auth header fields and visualization descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(common): cover auth header fields and visualization descriptors [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(common): cover auth header fields and visualization descriptors [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] test(workflow-operator): add unit tests for LogicalOp and Python operator descriptor bases [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add unit tests for LogicalOp and Python operator descriptor bases [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add unit tests for LogicalOp and Python operator descriptor bases [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add unit tests for LogicalOp and Python operator descriptor bases [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add unit tests for LogicalOp and Python operator descriptor bases [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add unit tests for LogicalOp and Python operator descriptor bases [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test(workflow-operator): add unit tests for LogicalOp and Python operator descriptor bases [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(engine): remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(engine): remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(engine): remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(engine): remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(engine): remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(engine): remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(engine): remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(engine): remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(engine): remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing (replaced by input-port materialization readers in #3425) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove dead CacheSourceOpExec and OpExecSource plumbing (replaced by input-port materialization readers in #3425) [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Flaky ReconfigurationIntegrationSpec: small CSV source can finish before pause [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Flaky ReconfigurationIntegrationSpec: small CSV source can finish before pause [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(amber): rename Controller to Coordinator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename Controller to Coordinator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename Controller to Coordinator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename Controller to Coordinator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename Controller to Coordinator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename Controller to Coordinator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename Controller to Coordinator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename Controller to Coordinator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename Controller to Coordinator [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(amber): rename execution coordinators to managers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename execution coordinators to managers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename execution coordinators to managers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename execution coordinators to managers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(amber): rename execution coordinators to managers [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Rename the Controller actor to Coordinator across the engine [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Rename the Controller actor to Coordinator across the engine [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Rename the Controller actor to Coordinator across the engine [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Rename workflow/region ExecutionCoordinators to ExecutionManagers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Rename workflow/region ExecutionCoordinators to ExecutionManagers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Rename workflow/region ExecutionCoordinators to ExecutionManagers [texera] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(frontend): allow null/undefined to pass enum validation for optional operator properties [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): allow null/undefined to pass enum validation for optional operator properties [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(frontend): allow null/undefined to pass enum validation for optional operator properties [texera] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(ci): backport every labeled PR in a multi-commit push, not just the head [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ci): backport every labeled PR in a multi-commit push, not just the head [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ci): backport every labeled PR in a multi-commit push, not just the head [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ci): backport every labeled PR in a multi-commit push, not just the head [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ci): backport every labeled PR in a multi-commit push, not just the head [texera] via GitHub
• [I] Direct backport only processes the head commit of a multi-commit push, silently skipping other labeled PRs [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Direct backport only processes the head commit of a multi-commit push, silently skipping other labeled PRs [texera] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages