Messages by Thread
-
-
[I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After Seata is integrated into distributed transactions, how can Seata AT processes not be executed in a single data source scenario (TransactionType.LOCAL is sufficient) [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] 需求：Job接入普罗米修斯监控 [shardingsphere-elasticjob]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor ComputeNodePersistService (#34555)
zhangliang
-
[PR] Refactor ComputeNodePersistService [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] org.apache.shardingsphere.driver.jdbc.core.connection.DriverDatabaseConnectionManager#createConnections leaks connection if replay throws exception [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] After performing an insert operation within a transaction,the data cannot be queried subsequently [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
[PR] Use DistSQLDatabaseRuleQueryExecutorAssert in ShowShardingTableRuleExecutorTest [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
[GH] (shardingsphere): Workflow run "E2E - Agent" failed!
GitBox
-
Re: [I] Enhance autoTables API to support more flexible sharding rules [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor StatisticsRefreshEngine (#34553)
zhangliang
-
[PR] Refactor StatisticsRefreshEngine [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] Could not commit JPA transaction when I use save to insert data to oracledatabase [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor StorageUnitManager (#34552)
zhangliang
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor StorageUnitManager (#34551)
zhangliang
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor StorageUnitManager (#34550)
zhangliang
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor DatabaseRuleConfigurationManager (#34549)
zhangliang
-
[PR] Refactor StorageUnitManager [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
[PR] Refactor DatabaseRuleConfigurationManager [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Rename DatabaseRuleItemManager (#34548)
zhangliang
-
[PR] Rename DatabaseRuleItemManager [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Move MetaDataContextManager (#34547)
zhangliang
-
[PR] Move MetaDataContextManager [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor DatabaseRulesBuilder (#34546)
zhangliang
-
[PR] Refactor DatabaseRulesBuilder [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] Rewrite error issue [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] Getting table or view doesnt exists exception [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
[PR] Adjust SPI order of GlobalDataChangedEventHandler [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor GlobalRuleChangedHandlerTest (#34544)
zhangliang
-
[PR] Refactor GlobalRuleChangedHandlerTest [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor PropertiesChangedHandlerTest (#34543)
zhangliang
-
[PR] Refactor PropertiesChangedHandlerTest [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Update release note for pr#34425 (#34542)
chengzhang
-
[PR] Update release note for pr#34425 [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
Re: [PR] Fix set OnDuplicateKeyColumnsSegment on PostgreSQLInsertStatement [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Fix set OnDuplicateKeyColumnsSegment on PostgreSQLInsertStatement (#34425)
duanzhengqiang
-
Re: [I] No value specified for parameter exception when use postgresql on duplicate [shardingsphere]
via GitHub
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Remove the test of Local transactions for ClickHouse integration module in nativeTest (#34530)
yx9o
-
(shardingsphere) branch master updated: Refactor ContextManager.reloadDatabase() (#34541)
zhangliang
-
[GH] (shardingsphere): Workflow run "NativeTest CI - GraalVM Native Image" failed!
GitBox
-
[GH] (shardingsphere): Workflow run "Required - Check" is working again!
GitBox
-
[GH] (shardingsphere): Workflow run "Required - Check" failed!
GitBox