La stessa cosa potrebbe accadere postando codice 'sensibile' su piattaforme di supporto alla programmazione come stackoverflow <https://stackoverflow.com/>, con la differenza che da lì si possono rimuovere (non prima ovviamente che il codice in questione sia stato sniffato da qualche migliaio di crawler). Non sappiamo bene come OpenAI usi i dati di conversazione, ma a occhio mi sembra difficile che un utente 'terzo' potrebbe far uscire parti significative di quel codice con qualche prompt. Nello sperimentare ChatGPT come generatore di codice, mi sono accorto che in effetti la sua 'conoscenza' è ferma a un paio di anni fa.
Mentre stiamo tutti impegnati nella battaglia sulla riservatezza, da cui OpenAI uscirà indenne, ci sfugge vero il problema: il costituirsi, sotto i nostri occhi, del monopolio della conoscenza. Se ci fosse un Garante del Pluralismo, questo sì che potrebbe far chiudere ChatGPT. G. On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 at 16:09, Daniela Tafani <daniela.taf...@unipi.it> wrote: > > Samsung workers have unwittingly leaked top secret data whilst using > ChatGPT to help them with tasks. > > The company allowed engineers at its semiconductor arm to use the AI > writer <https://www.techradar.com/best/ai-writer> to help fix problems > with their source code. But in doing so, the workers inputted confidential > data, such as the source code itself for a new program, internal meeting > notes data relating to their hardware. > > The upshot is that in just under a month, there were three recorded > incidences of employees leaking sensitive information via ChatGPT. Since > ChatGPT retains user input data to further train itself, these trade > secrets from Samsung are now effectively in the hands of OpenAI, the > company behind the AI service. > > In response, Samsung Semiconductor is now developing its own inhouse AI > for internal use by employees, but they can only use prompts that are > limited to 1024 bytes in size. > > In one of the aforementioned cases, an employee asked ChatGPT to optimize > test sequences for identifying faults in chips, which is confidential - > however, making this process as efficient as possible has the potential to > save chip firms considerable time in testing and verifying processors, > leading to reductions in cost too. > > In another case, an employee used ChatGPT to convert meeting notes into a > presentation, the contents of which were obviously not something Samsung > would have liked external third parties to have known. > > Samsung Electronics sent out a warning to its workers on the potential > dangers of leaking confidential information in the wake of the incidences, > saying that such data is impossible to retrieve as it is now stored on the > servers belonging to OpenAI. In the semiconductor industry, where > competition is fierce, any sort of data leak could spell disaster for the > company in question. > > It doesn't seem as if Samsung has any recourse to request the retrieval or > deletion of the sensitive data OpenAI now holds. Some have argued > <https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2023/02/08/chatgpt-is-a-data-privacy-nightmare.html> > that this very fact makes ChatGPT non-compliant with the EU's GDPR, as > this is one of the core tenants of the law governing how companies collect > and use data. It is also one of the reasons why > why Italy has now banned the use of ChatGPT nationwide > <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-65139406> . > > > > > https://www.techradar.com/news/samsung-workers-leaked-company-secrets-by-using-chatgpt > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa@server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >
_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
