Cogent is bigger.

HE is more widely peered, especially in IPv6.

I may be somewhat prejudice, though I don’t work for HE any more. Most on this 
list know the history so I won’t repeat it here.

Owen


> On Oct 21, 2018, at 05:39 , Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I guess first thing's first...  you aren't doing anything to force the 
> traffic that way, are you?
> 
> If you've got IPv6 deployed, chances are that no Google will be coming over 
> that Cogent.  :-)
> 
> CAIDA says Cogent is bigger.
> 
> http://as-rank.caida.org/asns/174/as-core 
> <http://as-rank.caida.org/asns/174/as-core>
> http://as-rank.caida.org/asns/6939/as-core 
> <http://as-rank.caida.org/asns/6939/as-core>
> 
> Being an eyeball network, what's going to impact that kind of usage the most 
> is where the next up connections to Netflix, Google, Akamai, Cloudflare, etc. 
> are located. If they're closer via HE than Cogent, that's where your traffic 
> will come from.
> 
> Looking at your network specifically, Netflix isn't on either IX that you're 
> on, so that HE traffic very well could be a majority Netflix.
> 
> What do your netflows say?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> 
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> 
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> 
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> 
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> From: "Baldur Norddahl" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 3:20:12 AM
> Subject: Re: Whats going on at Cogent
> 
> Is he.net <http://he.net/> smaller than Cogent? Over the past 24 hours we had 
> 6.7 Gbps peak from our HE link and 336 Mbps peak from our Cogent link. This 
> is inbound traffic. We are eyeballs and our outbound is a small fraction of 
> our inbound.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> Baldur
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 4:17 PM Dovid Bender <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> We have been very happy with HE. It was a no brainer over cogent. They are 
> smaller (so are we). When there are issues they are real fast to fix them, 
> you also get the personal touch which you don't get with others.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Eric Dugas <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I don't really get the Cogent/Google peering issues. I've been hearing this 
> for years... How about fixing it already? Telling customer to get other 
> transit providers to get to a given network is really bad.
> 
> On a side note, HE is still HE but they're trying really hard to be a good 
> netcitizen. They've finally pushed filtering for peers: http://routing.he.net 
> <http://routing.he.net/>. I wouldn't get transit from them, but in some 
> markets, they're the only affordable IP transit providers.
> 
> On Oct 16 2018, at 10:04 am, DaKnOb <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
> When I call and mention it I’m told that it’s HE’s fault (despite the lovely 
> cake), but when I also bring Google, then they tell me to get a different 
> provider just for this traffic, or meet them at an IX and send my traffic 
> from there.
> 
> About the staff rotation I’ve seen it too, and I’ve also seen an increase in 
> salespeople calling, for example when an AS is registered etc. in addition to 
> the normal calls..
> 
> On 16 Oct 2018, at 16:54, Dovid Bender <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> They call me every few months. the last time they emailed me I said I wasn't 
> interested because of the HE issue. I have yet to get another email.......
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Ca By <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:16 AM David Hubbard <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Have had the same sales rep for several years now; unfortunately he has no 
> ability to fix their IPv6 peering issue so we’re slowly removing circuits, 
> but otherwise for a handful of 10gig DIA circuits it’s been stable.
> 
>  
> 
> Yep, this.  Whenever Cogent calls, this is what i tell them. Black-holing HE 
> and Google ipv6 traffic, which is what they do if i use a default route from 
> them, is dead on arrival.  Shows they make bad decisions and dont put the 
> customer first, or even create such an illusion. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: NANOG <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on 
> behalf of Ryan Gelobter <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 6:04 AM
> To: NANOG <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Whats going on at Cogent
>  
> Anyone else seen terrible support and high turnover of sales/account people 
> at Cogent the last few months? Is there something going on over there 
> internally? I'm sure some people will say Cogent has always been crap but in 
> the past their account reps and support were pretty good. It seems to have 
> gone downhill the last 12 months really bad.
>  
> Regards,
> Ryan

Reply via email to