On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 08:02:28PM -0200, Alvaro Pereira wrote: > And note that the Juniper EX2500 does not run JUNOS, it is just an OEM box > from someone else...
Blade Networks, now IBM. > > Alvaro > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:23, Tim Vollebregt <t...@interworx.nl> wrote: > > > 2,5MB shared approximately. > > > > Aggregating 10G with microbursts is definately a no-go on such box. > > > > -Tim > > > > > > On 27-01-12 12:33, James Braunegg wrote: > > > >> How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ?? > >> > >> Kindest Regards > >> > >> James Braunegg > >> W: 1300 769 972 | M: 0488 997 207 | D: (03) 9751 7616 > >> E: james.braun...@micron21.com | ABN: 12 109 977 666 > >> > >> > >> This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain > >> privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended > >> recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it > >> to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in > >> error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then > >> delete the message from your computer. > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:t...@interworx.nl] > >> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM > >> To: nanog@nanog.org > >> Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton > >> > >> I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really > >> small buffers. > >> > >> EX3300 as TOR > >> EX82** as 10G aggregator > >> > >> -Tim > >> > >> On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote: > >> > >>> Juniper EX4500. > >>> > >>> -RR > >>> > >>> On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all > >>>> > >>>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test > >>>> around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port! > >>>> > >>>> Thank you > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE / NewNOG
