And note that the Juniper EX2500 does not run JUNOS, it is just an OEM box from someone else...
Alvaro On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:23, Tim Vollebregt <t...@interworx.nl> wrote: > 2,5MB shared approximately. > > Aggregating 10G with microbursts is definately a no-go on such box. > > -Tim > > > On 27-01-12 12:33, James Braunegg wrote: > >> How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ?? >> >> Kindest Regards >> >> James Braunegg >> W: 1300 769 972 | M: 0488 997 207 | D: (03) 9751 7616 >> E: james.braun...@micron21.com | ABN: 12 109 977 666 >> >> >> This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain >> privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended >> recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it >> to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in >> error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then >> delete the message from your computer. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:t...@interworx.nl] >> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton >> >> I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really >> small buffers. >> >> EX3300 as TOR >> EX82** as 10G aggregator >> >> -Tim >> >> On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote: >> >>> Juniper EX4500. >>> >>> -RR >>> >>> On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test >>>> around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port! >>>> >>>> Thank you >>>> >>>> >>>> >
