2,5MB shared approximately.
Aggregating 10G with microbursts is definately a no-go on such box.
-Tim
On 27-01-12 12:33, James Braunegg wrote:
How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ??
Kindest Regards
James Braunegg
W: 1300 769 972 | M: 0488 997 207 | D: (03) 9751 7616
E: james.braun...@micron21.com | ABN: 12 109 977 666
This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it to anyone
other than the addressee. If you have received this message in error please
return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
from your computer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:t...@interworx.nl]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really small
buffers.
EX3300 as TOR
EX82** as 10G aggregator
-Tim
On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote:
Juniper EX4500.
-RR
On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all
I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test
around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!
Thank you
