> -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Hoffman [mailto:jh...@unsane.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 9:44 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: ipv4's last graph > > On 02/02/2011 17:22, Matthew Petach wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Tony Hain <alh-i...@tndh.net> wrote: > >> So in the interest of 'second opinions never hurt', and I just can't > get my > >> head around "APnic sitting at 3 /8's, burning 2.3 /8's in the last 2 > months > >> and the idea of a 50% probability that their exhaustion event occurs > Aug. > >> 2011", here are a couple other graphs to consider. > >> http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools.pdf > >> http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools-zoom.pdf > >> > >> Tony > > Two things: > > > > 1) you'll get better uptake of your graph if it's visible as a simple > > image, rather than requiring a PDF download. :/ > Not wishing to advertise google but > > http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4- > rir-pools.pdf > and > http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4- > rir-pools-zoom.pdf > > > works for me without needing to download a pdf viewer
For some reason that viewer didn't work here, so I added jpg's to the site. http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools.jpg http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools-zoom.jpg > > Vince > > > > > 2) labelling the Y axis would help; I'm not sure what the scale > > of 1-8 represents, unless it's perhaps the number of slices of > > pizza consumed per staff member per address allocation request? I thought about leaving it off completely, but figured I would be asked for scale. It is /8's remaining until they drop into their 'last allocation' policy. I will see if I can figure out how to fit that into something readable. > > > > But I do agree with what seems to be your driving message, which > > is that Geoff could potentially be considered "optimistic". ^_^; Geoff has always been the optimist ... ;0 > > > > Matt
