Insufficient oversight from management.
Contact someone in the c-suite and report this "data mining."

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024, 10:40 Tom Beecher <beec...@beecher.cc> wrote:

> I really really really find it disgusting that companies have no problem
>> asking for this kind of information!! Its not only Juniper but also other
>> major brands.
>>
>
> Pretty standard capitalism feature. Everyone wants to know what else they
> might be able to sell you.
>
> I just bought a single switch and I can't update it without sharing all
>> this information.
>>
>
> If you purchased a support contract with the switch, they are legally
> required to provide you access to software updates. You may wish to remind
> them of that fact.
>
> If you didn't , you're technically not entitled to software updates
> anyways. But just make something up for those fields, or create a new
> account from scratch.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 5:28 AM chiel via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have an handful of Juniper devices (mx204 / QFX5100). I recently bought
>> a new QFX5110 switch I want to update to a newer software release.
>>
>> My account on the Juniper website seems to be disabled and therefor I
>> send an email to customer care. They replied with a form that I have to
>> fill in. A couple of of the questions are "*$ Revenue Range*", "*# of
>> Sales Reps*", "*# of Office Locations*". "*Details of potential
>> opportunities in progress (also Provide)*".
>>
>> I only filled in the form with my own details (name, email address,
>> etc..) and said I refused to give information about the other questions.
>> Juniper (customer care) replied with "*Please note we need these details
>> to reinstate the account. We can not proceed if the form is incomplete*.
>> "
>>
>> I really really really find it disgusting that companies have no problem
>> asking for this kind of information!! Its not only Juniper but also other
>> major brands.
>>
>> I just bought a single switch and I can't update it without sharing all
>> this information.
>>
>> I'm I do only one that feels this strongly about this?
>>
>

Reply via email to