I'm not complaining about the volume or diversity, just trying to help solve 
the concerns of those that are. 


That said, officially allowing some of the other types of conversation would 
likely increase the volume and diversity. How much, who knows? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> 
To: "Rod Beck" <rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com> 
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> 
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 1:06:10 PM 
Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG 
list...? 

i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic. 
in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in 
it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not 
need to fix that. 

randy 

--- 
ra...@psg.com 
`gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd ra...@psg.com` 
signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery 

Reply via email to