Agreed. Don't fix what isn't broken.
-----Original Message----- From: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:33pm To: "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com>, "Rod Beck" <rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? On 3/20/21 20:06, Randy Bush wrote: > i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic. > in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in > it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not > need to fix that. Simple. As. That. Mark.
