Ah, sorry, I didn't understand your message. Nevermind. On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ross Tajvar <r...@tajvar.io> wrote:
> > 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it >> > 2. He.net peering battle. Google it. >> > 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it. >> > >> > All of which point to them being pompous assholes. >> >> or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to >> peering, tech, ... we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good >> thing. >> > > Can you elaborate on this? What are they doing/not doing that you take > issue with? >
