> > > 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it > > 2. He.net peering battle. Google it. > > 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it. > > > > All of which point to them being pompous assholes. > > or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to > peering, tech, ... we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good > thing. >
Can you elaborate on this? What are they doing/not doing that you take issue with?
