And why are they not on any public peering exchange? Why only private?
> On Sep 16, 2019, at 19:35, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > > > >>> On Sep 16, 2019, at 17:48 , Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >>> >>> 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it >>> 2. He.net peering battle. Google it. >>> 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it. >>> >>> All of which point to them being pompous assholes. >> >> or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to >> peering, tech, ... we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good >> thing. >> >> randy > > Actually, their peering behavior in IPv4 is not quite as arrogant as it is in > IPv6, so no, they aren’t doing parity. > > Owen >
