nanog  

Messages by Date

• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Ryan Hamel
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) sronan
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Michael Thomas
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Michael Thomas
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Daniel Marks via NANOG
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Jay R. Ashworth
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Michael Thomas
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin
• 2024/02/16 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Jay R. Ashworth
• 2024/02/16 Re: The Reg does 240/4 John Levine
• 2024/02/16 Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
• 2024/02/16 Re: AWS WAF list Justin H.
• 2024/02/16 RE: The Reg does 240/4 Howard, Lee via NANOG
• 2024/02/16 RE: The Reg does 240/4 Brotman, Alex via NANOG
• 2024/02/16 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Mike Hammett
• 2024/02/16 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG
• 2024/02/16 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Mike Hammett
• 2024/02/16 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Mike Hammett
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Brian Knight via NANOG
• 2024/02/15 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Stephen Satchell
• 2024/02/15 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Justin Streiner
• 2024/02/15 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) John Levine
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Brian Knight via NANOG
• 2024/02/15 Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Mark Andrews
• 2024/02/15 Re: mail and IPv6, not The Reg does 240/4 Tim Howe
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin
• 2024/02/15 Re: mail and IPv6, not The Reg does 240/4 Matthew McGehrin
• 2024/02/15 Re: Lax dc / ix questiob Adam Brenner via NANOG
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
• 2024/02/15 RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Howard, Lee via NANOG
• 2024/02/15 IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Stephen Satchell
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/02/15 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/02/15 RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Howard, Lee via NANOG
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Chris Adams
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Dave Taht
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/15 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Mark Andrews
• 2024/02/14 Re: mail and IPv6, not The Reg does 240/4 John Levine
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Stephen Satchell
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/14 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Samplonius
• 2024/02/14 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Paul Ebersman
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/14 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 John Levine
• 2024/02/14 Re: Ongoing ARIN consultation on Resource Public Key Infrastructure/BGP intelligence Randy Bush
• 2024/02/14 Re: Ongoing ARIN consultation on Resource Public Key Infrastructure/BGP intelligence John Curran
• 2024/02/14 Re: Ongoing ARIN consultation on Resource Public Key Infrastructure/BGP intelligence Randy Bush
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 David Conrad
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Stephen Satchell
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/02/14 Ongoing ARIN consultation on Resource Public Key Infrastructure/BGP intelligence John Curran
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/02/14 Re: Anyone have contacts at the Amazon or OpenAI web spiders? John Levine
• 2024/02/14 Re: Utilizing USG networks for internal purposes (Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR) John Curran
• 2024/02/14 Re: Anyone have contacts at the Amazon or OpenAI web spiders? John R. Levine
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Ryan Hamel
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/14 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Denis Fondras via NANOG
• 2024/02/13 Re: Utilizing USG networks for internal purposes (Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR) Dave Taht
• 2024/02/13 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Glen A. Pearce
• 2024/02/13 Re: Anyone have contacts at the Amazon or OpenAI web spiders? Lincoln Dale
• 2024/02/13 Utilizing USG networks for internal purposes (Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR) John Curran
• 2024/02/13 Anyone have contacts at the Amazon or OpenAI web spiders? John Levine
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 David Conrad
• 2024/02/13 Re: Enough of The Reg does 240/4 John Levine
• 2024/02/13 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/13 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Glen A. Pearce
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 David Conrad
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 John Levine
• 2024/02/13 Re: [External] Re: The Reg does 240/4 Bryan Holloway
• 2024/02/13 Re: [External] Re: The Reg does 240/4 Hunter Fuller via NANOG
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Chris Adams
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 richey goldberg
• 2024/02/13 RE: The Reg does 240/4 Tony Wicks
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tim Howe
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Bryan Holloway
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tim Howe
• 2024/02/13 Re: jaguar network contact? Bryan Holloway
• 2024/02/13 Re: [External] Re: The Reg does 240/4 Hunter Fuller via NANOG
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Ryan Hamel
• 2024/02/13 jaguar network contact? Bryan Holloway
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tim Howe
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin
• 2024/02/13 Any AI or Data Science Projects? Adrian Bolster
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Bryan Holloway
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Stephen Satchell
• 2024/02/13 Re: Microwave Service- Oberkrämer, Germany Karsten Thomann via NANOG
• 2024/02/13 Microwave Service- Oberkrämer, Germany Robert DeVita
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/13 Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering Geoff Huston
• 2024/02/13 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/12 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Dave Taht
• 2024/02/12 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Jay R. Ashworth
• 2024/02/12 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Dave Taht
• 2024/02/12 Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker
• 2024/02/12 The Reg does 240/4 Jay R. Ashworth
• 2024/02/12 Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering Geoff Huston
• 2024/02/12 Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering Richard Laager
• 2024/02/12 Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering Job Snijders via NANOG
• 2024/02/12 Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering Richard Laager
• 2024/02/12 Re: IPv6 Test Pages for Fortune 500 and Top 100 web sites are back John Lightfoot
• 2024/02/12 IPv6 Test Pages for Fortune 500 and Top 100 web sites are back Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/02/12 Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering Job Snijders via NANOG
• 2024/02/12 IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering Job Snijders via NANOG
• 2024/02/12 Re: options for whois server Niels Bakker
• 2024/02/12 options for whois server Spurling, Shannon
• 2024/02/12 Lax dc / ix questiob Mehmet
• 2024/02/11 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Warren Kumari
• 2024/02/11 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett
• 2024/02/11 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/11 Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Ryan Hamel
• 2024/02/11 NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett
• 2024/02/09 Re: Verizon Business Contact Justin Krejci
• 2024/02/09 Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
• 2024/02/09 Re: ru tld down? Randy Bush
• 2024/02/09 Re: ru tld down? Gaurav Kansal via NANOG
• 2024/02/08 Verizon Business Contact Richard Laager
• 2024/02/08 Re: ru tld down? Mark Andrews
• 2024/02/08 Re: ru tld down? Mark Andrews
• 2024/02/08 Get Ready for NANOG 90! Socials, Hackathon, Committee Nominations + DEI Speaker Nanog News
• 2024/02/08 Spoofer Report for NANOG for Jan 2024 CAIDA Spoofer Project
• 2024/02/08 Re: ru tld down? Bjørn Mork
• 2024/02/08 Re: ru tld down? darkdevil
• 2024/02/08 Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Jérôme Nicolle
• 2024/02/07 Re: ru tld down? Töma Gavrichenkov
• 2024/02/07 Re: ru tld down? Mark Andrews
• 2024/02/07 Re: Federal subsidy boosting internet affordability set to expire unless Congress acts | PBS NewsHour Josh Luthman
• 2024/02/07 Federal subsidy boosting internet affordability set to expire unless Congress acts | PBS NewsHour Sean Donelan
• 2024/02/07 Re: ru tld down? Töma Gavrichenkov
• 2024/02/05 Instagram - Anyone here who can contact me off-list? Norman Jester
• 2024/02/05 Re: Chile Romain Fontugne via NANOG
• 2024/02/04 Re: Chile Andrew Latham
• 2024/02/03 Re: Chile Andrew Latham
• 2024/02/03 Chile Mehmet
• 2024/02/02 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/02 Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
• 2024/02/01 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) Warren Kumari
• 2024/02/01 NANOG 90 Keynote: Abstract Ponderings - A Ten-Year Retrospective with Google's Rob Shakir + More Nanog News
• 2024/02/01 Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 193, Issue 1 Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG
• 2024/02/01 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG
• 2024/02/01 Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Tom Beecher
• 2024/02/01 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Mohammad Khalil
• 2024/02/01 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Dominik Dobrowolski (dodobrow) via NANOG
• 2024/02/01 Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Andrian Visnevschi via NANOG
• 2024/02/01 Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Mark Andrews
• 2024/02/01 Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/01/31 Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Frank Habicht
• 2024/01/31 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Sofia Silva Berenguer
• 2024/01/31 Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/01/31 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Compton, Rich via NANOG
• 2024/01/31 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/01/31 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/01/31 Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR Tom Beecher
• 2024/01/31 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Tom Beecher
• 2024/01/31 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) Warren Kumari
• 2024/01/31 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) Tom Beecher
• 2024/01/31 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) William Herrin
• 2024/01/31 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Justin H.
• 2024/01/31 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) Warren Kumari
• 2024/01/31 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) Christopher Hawker
• 2024/01/31 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) William Herrin
• 2024/01/31 Re: If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/01/31 Re: NFPA 70 National Electrical Code 2026 first draft changes Martin Hannigan
• 2024/01/31 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Compton, Rich via NANOG
• 2024/01/31 If I announce 192.0.2.0/24, do I need a discard route? (Looking for a reference…) Warren Kumari
• 2024/01/31 Re: ru tld down? Bjørn Mork
• 2024/01/31 Re: SOVC - BGp RPKI Owen DeLong via NANOG
• 2024/01/31 SOVC - BGp RPKI Mohammad Khalil
• 2024/01/31 AWS WAF list Justin H.
• 2024/01/30 Re: ru tld down? Bill Woodcock

• Earlier messages
• Later messages