> On 12 Feb 2024, at 3:14 pm, Job Snijders via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> At NANOG 90, Merit presented on their IRRd v4 deployment. At the
> microphone Geoff Huston raised a comment which I interpreted as:
>
> "Can an exception be made for my research prefixes?"
>
no - I was making an observation that the presentation material was referring
to
"RPKI-Invalid" while their implementation was using "ROA-Invalid" There is a
difference between these two terms, as I'm sure you're aware.
cheers,
Geoff
