On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:57:04PM +0000, Camaleón wrote: > I would expect the text auto-wraps to fit the terminal windows, with no > marks indicating the break line at all. > > That was a test sample I made for you to view the problem. The real > problem is that I get that same behaviour from standard e-mails I get > (coming from different users).
Again, the *sender* must use format=flowed when they compose their message. There is no way for you to do it on the receiver's side properly in all cases. If you want to *force* reformatting the paragraph knowing that it may be wrong in some cases, you can use $display_filter with a program like `par` or `fmt`. > > As to your original problem, my guess is that the difference you see > > between various mail client is that some add the format=flowed > > attribute, which causes Mutt to nicely reformat the paragraph. Mutt > > can't do this in general because it has no way of knowing if the text > > was hand formated to look the way it does. So if you have a message > > with no format=flowed and paragraphs that are wider than your terminal, > > you will get the short lines where Mutt has wrapped. > > But the message indeed was set to use "format=flowed" as seen in the code > sample I sent before. In that example there was nowhere to break the line because there were no spaces. the choice is between wrapping the long line, or chopping it off (Mutt doesn't support the latter). As mentioned previous, 'set markers' controls the + char in the first column when Mutt wraps a line. me