On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:32:11 -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:17:24PM +0000, Camaleón wrote: >> - Image sample of failing e-mail (it will be auto-deleted in 7 days): >> http://picpaste.com/20100411_mutt_pager_wrapping.png >> >> - Raw code sample of failing e-mail (it will be auto-deleted in 1 day): >> http://pastebin.com/4t4kPSrh >> >> (Note: I forced the non-break in MUA to simulate the problem) > > I don't see a problem with what Mutt is displaying in your image. You > have a single long line that Mutt is wrapping at the width of your > terminal. What would you expect it to do in the situation?
I would expect the text auto-wraps to fit the terminal windows, with no marks indicating the break line at all. That was a test sample I made for you to view the problem. The real problem is that I get that same behaviour from standard e-mails I get (coming from different users). > As to your original problem, my guess is that the difference you see > between various mail client is that some add the format=flowed > attribute, which causes Mutt to nicely reformat the paragraph. Mutt > can't do this in general because it has no way of knowing if the text > was hand formated to look the way it does. So if you have a message > with no format=flowed and paragraphs that are wider than your terminal, > you will get the short lines where Mutt has wrapped. But the message indeed was set to use "format=flowed" as seen in the code sample I sent before. *** Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed *** Greetings, -- Camaleón
