* Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000128 12:51]:
> On 2000-01-28 11:05:25 +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
>
> > Yes, but do you have the problem that only 10% of your keys seem
> > to be recognised by mutt?
>
> That shouldn't happen. You may wish to try the unstable branch
> which should stabilize Really Soon Now.
I take it you're referring to the international version, as you know i need
the crypto support.
Is it possible for mortals (wrt mutt at least ;) to track the cvs head
branch?
> > Actually, I *do* understand your point. I just think mutt obtains
> > the information too quickly. If you have 500 or so keys, and all
> > of them get listed, it's a *bad* thing to do a validity check on
> > all of those, thus the user should be able to narrow it down to
> > the interesting keys, then ask for a validity check on those or
> > some which thing.
>
> Actually, the unstable branch of mutt gives some hints to the key
> ring dumper, so not all keys need to be displayed.
Sounds good to me :)
> > Isn't there a c for check key thing you can use?
>
> Yes, but that's rather inefficient and not the thing you want to use
> for quick key selection.
Neither is a 6 minute delay for the list to show up :)
Terje Elde
--
Xlehveh rhkau fudwuh få mydtemi dåh tk aqd rhkau jyt få kdyn (jyt ==
fudwuh?)
PGP signature
