On 2000-01-28 11:05:25 +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
> Yes, but do you have the problem that only 10% of your keys seem
> to be recognised by mutt?
That shouldn't happen. You may wish to try the unstable branch
which should stabilize Really Soon Now.
> Actually, I *do* understand your point. I just think mutt obtains
> the information too quickly. If you have 500 or so keys, and all
> of them get listed, it's a *bad* thing to do a validity check on
> all of those, thus the user should be able to narrow it down to
> the interesting keys, then ask for a validity check on those or
> some which thing.
Actually, the unstable branch of mutt gives some hints to the key
ring dumper, so not all keys need to be displayed.
> Isn't there a c for check key thing you can use?
Yes, but that's rather inefficient and not the thing you want to use
for quick key selection.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
