On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 09:03:27PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 10:24:38PM +0100, Dirk Foersterling
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 18.02.1999 Dirk Foersterling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I got used to mutt's behaviour of saving read messages from mailing
> > > lists. If I received a mail from a list, then the save-message function
> > > (in conjunction with save_name set) saved it to a file named after the
> > > list name. For example, every mail that was sent "To: mutt-users@.." got
> > > stored in =mutt-users.
> > >
> > > With mutt-0.95.3, this seems to be impossible. Is it?
> >
> > Sorry to anger you. Thanks for ignoring me. [....]
> > [....] Too late. Or did really nobody know the answer?
> > P.S.: Somwhow I was removed from the mailing list without further
> > notice. Do you dislike question-asking novices and upgraders that hard?
I saw the question, too, and I remember quickly glancing at what looked
like the answer the folks on this list and I eventually worked out when
I asked a slightly different version of that same question (i.e., using
a subdirectory under ~/Mail to save each list's e-mail, e.g., mutt-users
mail is saved to =mutt/mutt-users by default). At that point, I thought
``ok, it's already been answered...move on.''
> I saw your question, didn't know the answer off-hand, meant to look it
> up later, and forgot.
My guess is it's one (or both?) of two things:
1) I was wrong, and the response wasn't an answer after all, or
2) you got unsubscribed before the answer was sent, and never got it.
Later,
--jim
--
73 DE N5IAL (/4) | "Debating unix flavors in the context of anything
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Microsoft is like talking about which ice cream
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | flavor tastes least like sawdust with turpentine
Ft. Walton Beach, FL | sauce." --(void) in alt.sysadmin.recovery
