> > What I'm getting at is that while Mutt may be doing it right, you can get
> > down off your high horse and help out the people who have to be able to
> > work in a backwards compatible fashion. The current PGP-Notes documentation
> > scratches the surface at best. I figured it out - as I'm sure many others
> > have.. but if you want to be snotty, provide better documentation first.
>
> So then, please submit a petter entry for PGP-Notes.txt. I'm sure it
> would be included at once.
>
> Or put it on a website, which could be referred to, whenever the
> question pops up.
If I intented to be snotty to people about it, I would certainly do that.
Since I don't intend to be snotty to people about it, I feel that those who
are riding their high horses should back up their actions.
As time permits, I am actually working on some better notes. But I'm not
being rude to people because they can't figure it out for themselves. It
took me the better part of 4 hours to get a working configuration that
could send and recieve messages in both fashions, as neccessary. And it's
pretty messy.
--
Joe Rhett Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ISite Services
PGP keys and contact information: http://www.noc.isite.net/Staff/
