Thanks,
I didn't know about the RFC 2015 (IIRC).
But at least I do know now that I am doing right, what (allmost) everybody else
is doing wrong :)))
Andy
On Tue, Jan 19, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Andy --
>
> Welcome to the Great Mutt PGP Debate, wherein the religious philosophy
> of adhering to the proper RFC standards versus doing it the way it's
> always been.
>
> In short, PGP signatures and encrypted text really should, according
> to RFC 2015 (IIRC), be attachments. In even shorter, mutt folks say
> "fergit those who can't hack it because they have stupid mail programs"
> and Just Do It.
>
> This topic has come up *many* times -- maybe it should be an autoreply
> by a robot watching the list ;-)
>
>
> :-D
> --
> David Thorburn-Gundlach * It's easier to fight for one's principles
> (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
> (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Helping out at Pfizer
> http://www.poboxes.com/davidtg/
> Note: If poboxes.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*
>
--
"Nothing can be loved or hated
unless it is first understood"
Leonardo da Vinci 1452 - 1519
