-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 23 October 2002 23:07, you wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Timm Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 October 2002 04:22, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 07:49:52PM -0500, _brian_d_foy wrote: > > > > Does anyone have an objection to a new top-level namespace? Blog > > > > seems similar and has its own namespace. > > > > > > I'd be happy to see Freenet::* > > > > I'll take that, but I'm not sure further polution of the root space is > > warrented. > > do you have other ideas where it might fit?
None. It doesn't belong in any web stuff. Freenet uses a lot of crypto, but putting it in Crypt:: seems a rather tenuous link and is probably non-intuitive. I like the Netx:: idea, though. - -- X windows: A mistake carried out to perfection. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj24WkEACgkQqpueKcacfLRcGQCdFZ506HbDIHsD2Y78dhCsnsyq MHgAoIXYNZ/jTP6sjqFrXvX/OYgn0gF8 =w/va -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
