-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 23 October 2002 04:22, you wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 07:49:52PM -0500, _brian_d_foy wrote: > > > I'm working on some modules for Freenet (www.freenetproject.org) and > > > would like to register a namespace. It appears that someone suggested > > > the Net::Freenet:: namespace a few months ago > > > (http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules/2002-06/msg00366.html > > >), but I haven't found anything about it since. > > > > i think we finally decided not to put such things under Net. > > > > is Freenet a new protocol, or does it ride on top of something else > > (like nntp, http, or so on?). if it is another layer, i don't think > > it should be in Net. if it's a new low-level protocol, you might > > be ale to convince us. > > > > do you have other suggestions for names? would it fit in WebService? > > > > Does anyone have an objection to a new top-level namespace? Blog seems > > similar and has its own namespace. > > I'd be happy to see Freenet::*
I'll take that, but I'm not sure further polution of the root space is warrented. - -- X windows: It could be worse, but it'll take time. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj23VnMACgkQqpueKcacfLQnCACePPvQPMFXiI1iwGSEWC79Rbdf toIAn2OTl4nq6fWUX9FjDk8ktdF5sbES =AemR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
