-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andreas J. Koenig a écrit :
>
> One of the oldest ideas for namespace decisions was that when a
> family of modules constitutes something you can perceive as a
> framework, then any top level namespace is ok.
This is not my case: most code in my PKI is re-useable and wants to
blend into the existing CPAN landscape (eg Crypt::OpenSSL::CA). I'm
not doing a framework in the Catalyst or Inline sense.
- --
<< Tout n'y est pas parfait, mais on y honore certainement les
jardiniers >>
Dominique Quatravaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBRk1ez/TYH7KfeIIFAQKPXAQAmlPPLykXiu2ej8pCR2acfVIvLmCsn5P2
VU1KLrrl99I6lh//cLZcH0oN14ky5X2PvF+mgmJLdlypAHg7EKAk3LV8n9gQ3c6z
/cGS0R7ESpWYerpCXz2LTlrrMKFMYIJdn94h9DLiTXyPJFuZKggxMnLQTr5FyoyA
8mW4faI/Jg4=
=CLKL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
