On May 17, 2007, at 5:36 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
What's with all these ad hoc appending of "x", like DBIx and RTx?
Maybe the componenty parts should be Appx::* ?
Well, DBIx is actually something Tim Bunce requested, since he
didn't want people adding stuff to the DBI "hierarchy". For Mason
extensions, we asked people to use MasonX for similar reasons.
That's fine. I'm not disagreeing with that. Point is that there's
all sorts of stuff out there that doesn't even come close to being in
a strict hierarchy.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
