Andy Lester schreef: > Dave Rolsky: >> ?: >>> What's with all these ad hoc appending of "x", like DBIx and RTx? >>> Maybe the componenty parts should be Appx::* ? >> >> Well, DBIx is actually something Tim Bunce requested, since he >> didn't want people adding stuff to the DBI "hierarchy". For Mason >> extensions, we asked people to use MasonX for similar reasons. > > That's fine. I'm not disagreeing with that. Point is that there's > all sorts of stuff out there that doesn't even come close to being in > a strict hierarchy.
Such "a strict hierarchy" is not even possible. I wouldn't mind having code-less modules, just containing (future-proof) links to the real ones, something like application::SpamAssassin -> Mail::SpamAssassin -- Affijn, Ruud "Gewoon is een tijger."
