# from Andy Lester
# on Thursday 17 May 2007 08:26 pm:
>> I'm actually having a difficult time getting you all to agree to
>> *recommend* that things which will be installed in a directory named
>> "bin/" should have a namespace named "bin::"? Wow.
>
>LWP::UserAgent has stuff that installs into bin. WWW::Mechanize has
>stuff that installs into bin. etc etc etc
Fine. Great. So what?
Where do I put hello_world? Where do I put famwatch, reloader, behead,
bindiff, dwg_differ, dir_merge, fabsync, and hundreds of other *small*
utilities?
And. I would be fine with lwp-request being bin::lwp_request. I'm not
saying it has to be. I'm also not saying the *distribution* must have
the 'bin::' name.
bin:: is a good answer to the question of where to put utilities.
--Eric
--
Moving pianos is dangerous.
Moving pianos are dangerous.
Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo.
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------