Hallo > after having read all the references, I am a little bit confused concerning > the interlace/progressive question. I intend to burn PAL-SVCD. Since > progressive input seems to be much faster encoded than interlaced, I wonder > if the SVCD standard allows for progressive material? What does SVCD 1.0 say? I think most (any) player will accept both interlacing types.
The standart answer to your question can be found in the mjpeg howto, section: Creating MPEG2 Videos, subsection: Encoding destination TV (interlaced) or Monitor (progressive). If you like to fit much time on a SVCD you should also deinterlace, that saves some bitrate. Don't care about the encoding time, care for the output. > Are hardware players following the standard verbatim? That can only answer the produces of the HW Player. auf hoffentlich bald, Berni the Chaos of Woodquarter Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~gz/bernhard ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
