> You can either read the code or listen to somebody who has. I don't > know you either, but I know Henning and I know the bridge code, and > the short version is he's right. > > Has anyone noticed
That if you substitute BIble for code , in the section quoted above- its like listening to someone who believes in a technical high-priesthood - all blessed with the doctrine of technical infallibility which is great if you like dogma and blind faith. For Me the occasional rational explanation for why not to do something with a little concrete technical backup to support the assertion, is usually more useful. ;)
