On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:19:22 +0100 Marko Cupać <marko.cu...@mimar.rs> wrote:
> Can I hope that saying 'currently' means this is not the intended > design? Or should I come to peace with the fact that with OpenBSD and > PF I can forget about shaping inbound TCP traffic in a way that > child queues can expand to max link bandwidth unless there is a > congestion, while in congestion admin can choose which child queues to > throttle and in which order? Of course I didn't mean 'inbound' as 'incoming to NIC', but 'incoming from the Internet'. Actual shaping would take place outbound on internal interface. I'm writing this so I don't get another set of mails which warn me I can't shape inbound, but need to shape outbound traffic. -- Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupać https://www.mimar.rs/
