> On 15 Jan 2016, at 9:07 PM, Craig Skinner <skin...@britvault.co.uk> wrote: > > On 2016-01-15 Fri 12:53 PM |, David Gwynne wrote: >>> On 13 Jan 2016, at 19:19, Marko Cupa?? <marko.cu...@mimar.rs> wrote: >>> >>> Have we come to conclusion that currently prio makes no sense at all? >> >> it wont have the effect you want. that doesn't mean it doesn't make sense >> somewhere else. >> > > Such as an ADSL PPPoE bridge?
yeah. the other thing to note is that loading a ruleset resets the assignment of existing states to queues. states are assigned to queues via rules, but if the rules go away (which is what happens when you load a new ruleset) the intermediary between rules and queues has gone. it kind of sucks, especially for testing. dlg
