On 27/04/17 16:47, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 27/04/17 10:15 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Modern disks are extremely large and are only going to get bigger.
Usage has shown frequent Mesa upgrades can result in the cache
growing very fast i.e. wasting a lot of disk space unnecessarily.
5% seems like a more reasonable default.
Cc: "17.1" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org>
---
src/util/disk_cache.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/disk_cache.c b/src/util/disk_cache.c
index d9de8ef..9fd7b96 100644
--- a/src/util/disk_cache.c
+++ b/src/util/disk_cache.c
@@ -324,24 +324,24 @@ disk_cache_create(const char *gpu_name, const char
*timestamp)
case '\0':
case 'G':
case 'g':
default:
max_size *= 1024*1024*1024;
break;
}
}
}
- /* Default to 1GB or 10% of filesystem for maximum cache size. */
+ /* Default to 1GB or 5% of filesystem for maximum cache size. */
if (max_size == 0) {
statvfs(path, &vfs);
- max_size = MAX2(1024*1024*1024, vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_bsize / 10);
+ max_size = MAX2(1024*1024*1024, vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_bsize / 20);
}
5% can still be quite a lot (what if every library on the system tried
using that much for itself?). How about 1%?
I've pushed these two patches for now.
Anyway, this is a step in the right direction, so
Acked-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
