On 27/04/17 10:15 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> Modern disks are extremely large and are only going to get bigger.
> Usage has shown frequent Mesa upgrades can result in the cache
> growing very fast i.e. wasting a lot of disk space unnecessarily.
>
> 5% seems like a more reasonable default.
>
> Cc: "17.1" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org>
> ---
> src/util/disk_cache.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/disk_cache.c b/src/util/disk_cache.c
> index d9de8ef..9fd7b96 100644
> --- a/src/util/disk_cache.c
> +++ b/src/util/disk_cache.c
> @@ -324,24 +324,24 @@ disk_cache_create(const char *gpu_name, const char
> *timestamp)
> case '\0':
> case 'G':
> case 'g':
> default:
> max_size *= 1024*1024*1024;
> break;
> }
> }
> }
>
> - /* Default to 1GB or 10% of filesystem for maximum cache size. */
> + /* Default to 1GB or 5% of filesystem for maximum cache size. */
> if (max_size == 0) {
> statvfs(path, &vfs);
> - max_size = MAX2(1024*1024*1024, vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_bsize / 10);
> + max_size = MAX2(1024*1024*1024, vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_bsize / 20);
> }
5% can still be quite a lot (what if every library on the system tried
using that much for itself?). How about 1%?
Anyway, this is a step in the right direction, so
Acked-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
