Modern disks are extremely large and are only going to get bigger.
Usage has shown frequent Mesa upgrades can result in the cache
growing very fast i.e. wasting a lot of disk space unnecessarily.
5% seems like a more reasonable default.
Cc: "17.1" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org>
---
src/util/disk_cache.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/disk_cache.c b/src/util/disk_cache.c
index d9de8ef..9fd7b96 100644
--- a/src/util/disk_cache.c
+++ b/src/util/disk_cache.c
@@ -324,24 +324,24 @@ disk_cache_create(const char *gpu_name, const char
*timestamp)
case '\0':
case 'G':
case 'g':
default:
max_size *= 1024*1024*1024;
break;
}
}
}
- /* Default to 1GB or 10% of filesystem for maximum cache size. */
+ /* Default to 1GB or 5% of filesystem for maximum cache size. */
if (max_size == 0) {
statvfs(path, &vfs);
- max_size = MAX2(1024*1024*1024, vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_bsize / 10);
+ max_size = MAX2(1024*1024*1024, vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_bsize / 20);
}
cache->max_size = max_size;
/* A limit of 32 jobs was choosen as observations of Deus Ex start-up times
* showed that we reached at most 11 jobs on an Intel i5-6400 CPU@2.70GHz
* (a fairly modest desktop CPU). 1 thread was chosen because we don't
* really care about getting things to disk quickly just that it's not
* blocking other tasks.
*/
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
