On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Patrick Baggett <baggett.patr...@gmail.com> wrote: > While I agree with the principle of what you're saying (the process > can be improved, etc.), being extremely sarcastic and condescending is > not the best way to effect change.
Can you please point out which part of the *1st* message in this forum thread is sarcastic and condescending? General rule: If it cannot be pointed out then it doesn't exist. Clarification: The 1st message in this forum thread is http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-June/119332.html Thanks. > It's pretty clear you're getting > negative reactions to your responses due to non-technical reasons and > for some, the conversation is over before it started. It seems like a > silly reason to have what could be potentially a useful conversation > halted. Ultimately, you're still dealing with people, love it or hate > it. > > Is your real aim here to have an efficient patch reviewing process? > Then be pragmatic, and not just about your content, but also the > "metacontent": connotations and style when you present and discuss it. > Otherwise, it doesn't matter if you're wrong, right, have a point, or > not: you will not be heard. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
