On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:49 AM, ⚛ <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaeh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 03.06.2016 13:12, wrote: >>>> >>>> Situation: Looking at the content displayed by the web browser for URL >>>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/mesa/series and sub-pages >>>> accessible via the links. >>> >>> >>> Patchwork isn't really central to most people's workflow as far as I >>> understand it. >> >> Ok. But how does a developer know (better: gets notified) when a patch >> has been accepted and added to mainline mesa-git? Viewing all git log >> messages every day because - just in case - the patch _might_ have >> been added to mesa-git seems quite inefficient to me. > > The person applying the patch will send an email saying "Thanks, > applied", or "Thanks, pushed".
Shouldn't repetitive tasks be left to machines whenever possible? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
