> I will point out a couple notes/observations: > > Kernel (drm/dri-devel), xorg, and other related projects use the same > process, and a lot of us do (or at least at some point have) been > active in 2 or more of these. > > Also, I have seen/used some other processes (gerrit, github pulls, > etc).. and IMO on those projects the review process ended up being a > lot more rubber-stamping and less thorough review of the changes. > There is some value in not making things too "push-button"..
What are people's opinions on patchwork? I'm a regular reader but not contributor. I find the interface appealing and overall not too difficult to see recently submitted patches. Is it slower (workflow-wise)/less convenient to use than email? Or are there certain use-cases that just don't work? -- Patrick _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
