Reading through that section of the draft (and not wanting to be Reviewer 2 in 
any way) the data they’re using looks plausible and is referenced as to where 
they got it from. Kaspersky has a big enough installed base that I’d basically 
trust the numbers as reasonable. 

laura 

> On 9 Dec 2024, at 18:07, John Levine via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> 
> It’s this draft, not formally published.
> 
> https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10776773
> 
> Please consider the environment before reading this message.
> John Levine, jo...@taugh.com 
> 
>> On Dec 9, 2024, at 12:09, Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/9/2024 8:59 AM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
>>> I ask because I've ben looking at a paper that asserts that the number
>>> is about 50% and has been for a long time, which just seems wrong.
>> If the paper is published, what is the citation to it?
>> 
>> d/
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dave Crocker
>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>> bbiw.net
>> ***  bluesky: @dcrocker.bsky.social  ***
>> mast: @dcrocker@mastodon.social
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

-- 
The Delivery Expert

Laura Atkins
Word to the Wise
la...@wordtothewise.com

Delivery hints and commentary: http://wordtothewise.com/blog    






_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to