Dnia 18.10.2024 o godz. 13:46:07 Slavko via mailop pisze: > AFAIK, the SPF, DKIM nor DMARC never had SPAM as goal. They all (together > or standalone), from my point of vie, did significant drop of simple fake > sender > usage, in mean, if one's bank implements (properly) them and you will check > them, users cannot be foiled by "not...@yourbank.com" from fake sources.
We had this discussion already :), maybe with someone else :) If my bank wants that email from them won't be forged, they will digitally sign that mail with S/MIME certificate (which they actually do), and both email clients I use (mutt and Evolution) display a prominently visible message about signature being good or bad when I open that mail. The recipient should know that the mail without signature, or with a bad signature, is fake. The same does my phone provider. Isn't this the *ultimate* solution against forgery? -- Regards, Jaroslaw Rafa r...@rafa.eu.org -- "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub." _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
