Dňa 14. októbra 2024 17:00:43 UTC používateľ Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> napísal:
>But definitely - as said here many times - "junk" has meaning too close to >"trash" for the users to mix one with the other, thus having many legitimate >messages being marked as spam. Anyone is free to understand any word as he/she want. AFAIK people do that and will do that with any term. IMO no worth to bother with term, especially when it is in foreign language (no one MUA, which my users are using, localize it).. AFAIK, here is \Junk mailbox type defined for IMAP, see RFC 6154, you can name that mailbox as you want, set that special type for it and any compliant MUA will recognize it, if you really want. But why to (re)invent new name... regards -- Slavko https://www.slavino.sk/ _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
