Dnia 14.10.2024 o godz. 15:34:53 Slavko via mailop pisze: > I don't know how others, but here, the well recognized SPAM is rejected > after DATA, thus not delivered at all. I use Junk folder too, where ends > messagess, which are too suspicious for delivery to INBOX, but not > enough bad to be rejected == can be false positive (our e-shops and one > bank are shampions of bad messages). > > In other words, while i am not sure that it is SPAM, it is most probably > Junk ;-)
But definitely - as said here many times - "junk" has meaning too close to "trash" for the users to mix one with the other, thus having many legitimate messages being marked as spam. If you don't want to use the name "spam" for the folder (which, in fact, may be also misleading for the user - as I have written several times previously, many users don't look at spam folder at all, as it clearly says "spam", so they think, why should they look at spam?), then probably the most adequate name would be "suspicious" - exactly that. Thus the user knows that it is NOT a trash folder, and it is also NOT a definite spam - there may be messages there that are wrongly classified and maybe he/she should look at them. -- Regards, Jaroslaw Rafa r...@rafa.eu.org -- "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub." _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
