On 1/22/21 06:38, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
But forwarding an abuse address that is somewhat expected to receive problematic content to a service that tries to keep such content out of their users' mailboxes doesn't really look very professional, and even if it isn't technically Sendgrid who perform the filtering this approach has the effect of putting a content filter on the abuse mailbox.
You're assuming that Sendgrid actually cares about or reads abuse complaints in the first place. The spam is a steady flow, nothing new. In Sendgrid's case, filtering abuse complaints through Google may well be by design. They just as well could have used Mailinator considering the amount of attention they give complaints of abuse.
-- Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
