Note the quote from the Comcast FAQ page "The ISP may redact..."

That seems to indicate that this is Comcast's decision, not Return Path's.

Mickey

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>
wrote:

> Well, I just received this from Return Path:
>
> -------
>
> Thank you for contacting us.
>
> In order to obtain more information about the abusive user, you may
> implement a tracking ID, Please see the information below
> that is provided in  the Comcast FAQ page:
>
> "The ISP may redact parts of the original message to protect the privacy
> of their users. In the event an ISP redacts subscriber email addresses from
> their feedback loop messages, you should incorporate a tracking ID unique
> to the recipient's record in your database and your messages so that you
> can process the removals. You can add this ID in the body of the message or
> add an "X" header in the header of the message. An example of this could be
> "X-SenderName-ClientID: 543432".
>
> --------
>
> I find it rather disturbing that one of the major vendors of spam
> filtering services does things in such a non-standards-compliant way.
> Everyone else (well, AOL, Yahoo, the other "big boys") seem to return
> message-id along with an FBL notice.  Return Path seems to filter it out.
>
> That's just painful.
>
> Sigh.
>
> Miles Fidelman
>
> On 6/29/16 3:33 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> That's the thing.  I DO VERP our SMTP envelopes, but Comcast's FBL reports
> only include this:
>
> User-Agent: ReturnPathFBL/1.0
> Abuse-Type: complaint
> Arrival-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:23:37 +0000
> Feedback-Type: abuse
> Version: 1
> Source-IP: 207.154.13.48
> Original-Rcpt-To: 8d29aa11b1810bec67beca0de3554...@lists.fusn.org
> Original-Mail-From: fusn-ow...@lists.fusn.org
> Reported-Domain: lists.fusn.org
>
>
> ForwardedMessage.eml
>
> Subject:
> [8d29aa11b1810bec67beca0de3554359] Free: pair of planters
>
> From:
> <redacted by me>
> Date:
> 6/29/16, 11:23 AM
> To:
> 8d29aa11b1810bec67beca0de3554...@lists.fusn.org
>
>
> Note that the
>
> Original-Rcpt-To: 8d29aa11b1810bec67beca0de3554...@lists.fusn.org
>
> and
> To:
> 8d29aa11b1810bec67beca0de3554...@lists.fusn.org
>
> Addresses are not the VERPed address, or even the recipient address.  They
> seem to be an obfuscated version of the LIST address.  Not really helpful.
>
> As far as I can tell, there is NOTHING in the abuse report that can be
> associated with either the final recipient or a message-id that would let
> me locate the message in our outgoing logs (from which, given VERP, I could
> find the recipient).
>
> Based on other comments, I sent a query to Return Path - I'm half
> expecting that they'll offer to sell me the info, or a slot on their
> whitelist.
>
> Sigh...
>
> Miles Fidelman
>
> On 6/29/16 3:10 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Miles Fidelman <
> <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
>
>> Is there anybody here from Comcast mail operations who can provide some
>> guidance as to how to identify the originator of an abuse report, so I can
>> remove them from the list(s)?
>>
>
> If you VERP the SMTP envelope sender address, that should help you out. It
> comes back embedded in the report as "Original-Mail-From:"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing 
> listmailop@mailop.orghttps://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
> --
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is.  .... Yogi Berra
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing 
> listmailop@mailop.orghttps://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
> --
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is.  .... Yogi Berra
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to